🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the people who work with them regularly.

After the federal government disallowed the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near the famous falls where they are held warned to end their lives unless the authorities covers the cost of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and communal behavior suggest they are remarkably smart mammals – something a former trainer discovered first-hand.

Burgess spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the nuances and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with contrasting personalities.

“One whale accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Both altered the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her three years at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park links to age-related causes, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand results of the closure. “Concrete is falling apart from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a request for comment, but in the past claimed: “The whales … obtain far superior health care and constant supervision than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was terminated from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park thought details of the incident were leaked to the press and she was let go not long after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a single beluga would require “significant personnel”, trucks and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports calls for the whales to be transferred promptly from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to send the whales to China.

“To approve the application would have meant a perpetual life in confinement and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official wrote. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the ocean, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an export that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks indicate a broader lack of awareness of the facts of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers struggle to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of food for Indigenous peoples.

A proposed sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective location, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the prospect of a refuge represents a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a viable approach in the coming months.

The project lead, director of the initiative, said the facility will replicate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|